Featured In

Posts Tagged ‘attention’

Attention Management Infographic by Brian Massey

Wednesday, March 9, 2011 @ 09:03 AM
Maura

My dear friend and awesome Conversion Scientist, Brian Massey attended my RISE session yesterday, titled, “Time Management is Out.  What’s Next?” I watched him taking fast and furious notes, but I had no idea he was creating such a fantastic infographic of my presentation!

Brian’s infographic skills are in high demand so I feel truly blessed that he created this for me, but also that he’s allowing me to share it.  Brian’s talents are numerous and he sometimes offers free conversion analyses of websites.  I would suggest that you try to get on his schedule.  You won’t be sorry.  Thank you so much, Brian, for sharing your talent with me!

(For a larger version, click the image, then select “Actions, View all Sizes.”)

Time Management is Out. What's next? Attention Management

What You Can Learn About Life from a Good Receptionist

Monday, March 7, 2011 @ 06:03 AM
Maura

I spent summers during high school working for temp agencies, often as a receptionist during staff vacations.  It was great business experience.  It showed me how a busy office operates, taught me proper business etiquette, and forced me to get really good at typing!  All valuable skills for my future career.

One thing that a receptionist will learn with some experience is that in terms of priority, customers standing in front of you always come before customers on the phone.  If someone has walked into a business, the receptionist should give them his or her immediate attention.  If the phone rings, the caller gets placed on hold while the receptionist finishes assisting the customer in front of them.

With everyone practically carrying “the world in their pocket” via their smartphone, sometimes we forget to prioritize the existence of others in our presence, or real-world experiences, over the demands on our attention from calls, emails, text messages, FaceBook and Twitter updates, and check-ins (especially to see who else is there, as if the person we came with is not enough.)  Not to mention the pull to look up the answer to the question that’s been bothering us, or to check the weather for tomorrow while we’re thinking of it, or to see how far it is to our next appointment.

All of these things add a new and rich dimension to our lives, and I’m an avid user of most of these fantastic communication tools.  However, consider this quote from Martin Luther King, Jr.:

“Occasionally in life there are those moments of unutterable fulfillment which cannot be completely explained by those symbols called words. Their meanings can only be articulated by the inaudible language of the heart.”

Those are moments that can only happen when you are present in the life that you are living at that moment, and not the one happening inside the little box in your hand.  Personally, I’d hate to miss one of those moments that King describes.  I think it serves me to remember what I learned during my years as a receptionist.

Thanks for reading!

Thoughts on Checking Email First Thing in the Morning

Saturday, February 5, 2011 @ 10:02 AM
Maura

I don’t claim to be a professional organizer, but I can’t deny that there is a close relationship between organization and productivity.  Recently my dear friend and nationally renowned professional organizing expert Lorie Marrero of ClutterDiet wrote on her blog about some prevalent productivity advice.  I began to write in her comments and then realized I had way too much to say on the topic.  So Lorie, thank you for inspiring my blog post this morning!  I definitely recommend that you head over to Lorie’s excellent blog and read her post for yourself.  My thoughts follow…

The premise of her post is that contrary to popular advice, it’s ok to check email first thing in the morning.  For me, the real question is whether or not you are supporting your own focused attention, or sabotaging it.  Thank you for reminding me, Lorie, that there is always “sound-bite” advice and then there is the whole story.  In this fast-paced media-rich, short-attention span environment we live in, perhaps I’m guilty of too often giving “sound-bite advice.” But I frequently tell people that when it comes to professional advice, the answer to pretty much any question you ask will often be: “it depends.” The same is true here: should you check email first thing in the morning?  It depends.

It depends on if you have a handheld device. Believe it or not, there are still many people who don’t, and their only option for email is their computer. But I talk a lot about how technology is making old “time management” advice outdated, and this is a good example – the “old advice” is that you shouldn’t check messages first thing in the morning, because handheld devices first didn’t exist for email, and then weren’t that prevalent.  That’s certainly not the case anymore, however I don’t think we’re quite at the point yet, where we can assume that everybody has one.

It depends on if you are an independent professional/self-employed, or if you work in an office. I think this is an important distinction with regard to your email schedule.  You are less likely to miss something by foregoing email if you are sitting at your desk in a large office and you decide to tackle your task list instead of checking email.  Someone will pop their head in, you’ll overhear something, or they’ll call you.

It depends on if you have time to be proactive that morning, or if you are rushing off to a meeting. The whole point, as Lorie mentioned, of not checking email first thing, is to have some *pro*active time.  Don’t go to email first thing, so you can spend some time being proactive, knocking off items on your task list.  If you were rushing off to a meeting that morning, you wouldn’t have proactive time anyway, nor would you be able to get sucked in to your email, so checking to see if that meeting has been delayed or canceled is certainly prudent.

It depends on how you’ve trained those with whom you have a relationship. Regarding “digging in our heels and insisting people should behave differently”…I actually don’t think this is what happens most of the time.  For the people you don’t interact with often, like the random press request, Lorie is absolutely right.  I’d go out on a limb and say the vast majority of actual communication most people get via email (not spam or robomails or newsletters, but actual communication) is from people with whom they have a relationship.  And if you have a relationship with them, you’ve probably “trained” them in how to communicate with you, whether you realize it or not.  Real estate agents ask me, “how do I get my clients to stop calling me at 9 o’clock at night?”  My response: “stop answering.” People who need to communicate with you will do what works. If you have “trained” them that you will respond to an email within 5 minutes, then they will feel comfortable using email for emergencies. If however, they email you about something important and you don’t respond, they will typically try reaching you some other way and the way that works, is probably the way they will use next time.  So it’s not about wishing and hoping that everyone else will do things differently, but rather about setting up the circumstances so that your own productivity is supported rather than sabotaged.

But for the record, if you have a handheld advice, AND you have the self-discipline not to get sucked in, I think skimming your messages on your handheld device several times a day, including first thing in the morning, is certainly a valid option (I do it myself).  Just be careful, because there might be nothing to stop you from scanning on your phone, and then rushing off to your computer to “just respond to this one…” And then it’s all downhill from there!

Thanks so much to Lorie, for her great advice, and for providing the opportunity for a nuanced discussion of a common productivity technique!  She knows I’m a fan. =)

University Social Media Ban Pt. 2

Thursday, December 30, 2010 @ 07:12 AM
Maura

This is Maura Thomas from RegainYourTime.com. This is part two of my interview with Charles Palmer, the Executive Director of the Center for Advanced Entertainment & Learning Technologies, of Harrisburg University of Science & Technology. Please click the link at the top of the page to read earlier parts.

Please click below to hear the transcript, and come back tomorrow and in the coming days to read or listen to the rest of the interview.

Palmer Interview Segment 2

MT: Well before…I’m dying to hear about this…that kind of feedback and those results…can you tell me a little bit about how the idea came about?  Was there a specific…was there a catalyst? Or did it just sort of come out of a discussion?

CP: There was sort of a catalyst.  Our provost, Eric Darr, Dr. Eric Darr, Eric Darr was thinking about this for a while, but he said one day he was sitting there watching his daughter, and she had multiple chat windows open, her iphone was on, she was listening to music, she was, no, her iphone was on for another session, she was streaming Pandora, she was watching TV, and FaceBook open as well.  Doing all these things and just looking at her…I’m sorry?

MT: How old is his daughter?

CP: Oh, she is 16.

MT: 16, ok.

CP: Yeah, and this…just this idea of “holy heck, she is really engaged in all these things, but what is the level of that engagement, and how meaningful are some of those conversations that she’s having.  Is multitasking true?  Can people really carry on quality engagements at that level, at that frequency.”  So his idea was, well, our students do that at the university.  What if they didn’t have access to that?  What would that mean for them personally?  And what would that mean for them as a student at a highly technical university?

MT: The goal, at least as I read about it, the goal was to challenge the student body to think about their…and probably the faculty as well, to think about their reliance on social media?

CP: Exactly.

MT: Is that an accurate statement as a goal?

CP: Yeah, yeah, exactly.  How does it impact your daily life, and is it the best way of going about some of those things.

MT: Do you have a specific plan to measure that goal?

CP: We use the word “experiment” extremely lightly.  This was more of just “hey, let’s get together, let’s think about this, let’s try this little thing, because we’re a smaller university and…quite frankly, most of the larger…I can’t think of another university that could do it for an entire week, just shut everything off like we did.

MT: Did you just block FaceBook, or did you take away…you take away internet access, right?

CP: No, we blocked all the ports that the social networking applications use.  So, there are certain ports that FaceBook will hit on a firewall, and Twitter, and YouTube, and some of the chat, instant messaging softwares, they hit particular ports on the firewall, so those were just turned off.  And LinkedIn, LinkedIn was probably a huge one that people didn’t expect.

MT: Ok, so you still had internet access, you just blocked access to…primarily social media.

CP: Exactly.

MT: Ok.  Do you think that that goal, of challenging people to think about it, to think about their reliance, and the way that they communicated, was achieved?

CP: It was, yeah, we had a three focus groups, or two focus groups after the event, to try and find out what people thought about it, how it reallly impacted their day-to-day life.  We figured about 15% of our students actually engaged in the…abstinence is sort of a better word, of social media.  As as I said earlier, that’s not including of course those students who walked down the street to get access, or couldn’t wait to get home to get online.  But we did have a number of people who really did just stay away from it.  And we had a number of students who said, “you know what, it didn’t impact my daily life that much…I’m not tweeting, I’m not a big FaceBook user that I need to be accessing it all the time.”

MT: Did you ask them?

CP: Yes, we had a focus group…

MT: No, I mean did you ask them to refrain during the ban?

CP: Yes.

MT: Ok.

CP: Yes, so it was “hey students, there is this ban that’s going on in the building…” There were a lot of emails and a lot of conversation that went on and we’d love to hear your response.  They all knew that in a couple of our GenEd courses they were going to have a write a paper on the experience at the end of it.  So I think that’s why we got a number of students who really refrained from it.  We asked, we didn’t sort of say, “hey, you must.  We can limit you in the building but you can do whatever you want outside of the building.”  And, you know, as Jimmy Kimmel said, most of our students have smartphones.  So…

MT: Right.

CP: That doesn’t really hinder that usage except inside of the classroom.  Which was one of the things of interest, of note, that came out of the focus group, was how many students actually use social media in their classes as a means of distraction.  Yeah.  As a distraction from the lecture that was going on.

MT: Sure.

CP: It’s funny, the provost and I were sitting with a group of students, and one student said, “wow, I really have to pay attention in class now.”    We just stared at him.  He realized about the time that it actually left his mouth, what he had said, but were just like, “really?”

(Laughing)

Please come back tomorrow for part 3 of my interview with Charles Palmer of Harrisburg University.  Thanks for reading!

University Social Media Ban Pt. 1

Wednesday, December 29, 2010 @ 04:12 PM
Maura

This is Maura Thomas from RegainYourTime.com. This is part one of my interview with Charles Palmer, the Executive Director of the Center for Advanced Entertainment & Learning Technologies, of Harrisburg University of Science & Technology. Please click the link at the top for an introduction to this interview.

Please click below to hear the transcript, and come back tomorrow and in the coming days to read or listen to the rest of the interview.

Palmer Interview Segment 1

MT: So I was just reading up on the Center for Advanced Entertainment and Learning Technologies. It sounds like a really forward-thinking sort of center at the University.

CP: Yeah, we’re trying to really blur the line between education and entertainment. If you can keep the student engaged, you can teach them things.  Prior to being here at Harrisburg I was at Carnegie Mellon and worked at a center where that’s pretty much what the focus was on.

MT: That’s great!  I guess, before I get into the questions I sent you, I’m interested to know, now that I’ve read a little bit more about this, what you thought about the ban.  Were you involved in the decision?

CP: I was not involved in the original decision but I was brought up to speed well before it went out into the public and just to get ideas and what we could do with it and I have to say, when it first came about, all I could think of was students with pitchforks and faculty saying that they were going to leave the university as soon as they could, but I was pleasantly surprised at how many people actually embraced it or it didn’t really affect them, in some ways.

MT: So you thought that there would be sort of a backlash on the part of the students but it didn’t happen…

CP: I think so because if you think of students in general, anytime they get a chance to bash something and voice their opinion, they will, and not in a bad way, but you know, they’re at that age group where they want to be heard and they want their opinion to be known.  So yeah, I really did expect more students to have a problem with it.

MT: Do you think that the fact that it was an experiment, and they knew that it was going to end in a week had anything to do with…

CP: Well, yeah, there are two reasons that made it palatable to them…it was the fact that yes, it was only for a week, for five days, so hey I can do anything for five days.

MT: Right…

CP: And the fact that banning it, we were banning it from our academic center, but that doesn’t stop our students from going home, or walking to the local coffee shop and getting online there.

MT: So the academic center, did that include the dorms?

CP: We actually don’t have dorms.

MT: You don’t have dorms, ok, so you’re a commuter school.

CP: We don’t have dorms, right, the majority of our students live within a five block or so…there are other facilities here that students rent apartments from, but we don’t…for another year we won’t have dorms.  So you know, there are all those things that have to come into play to where someone…we’re really talking about a student saying, “ok, I guess I can stop doing this for 6 hours a day.”

MT: Right.

CP: As opposed to how the media made it sound like it was…seven days of no access.  But even then it was really bizarre…how many students could not be six hours away from some of these outlets.

MT: How did you see evidence of that?  What kind of things did you see?

CP: Well, we did…throughout the week I sat down and the Provost and I we would sit down with different students and talk to them about how it was going…I brought it up as topics of discussion in my classes.  And you get anecdotal evidence of stories of a handful of students that will walk two blocks down the street the hotel, the Hilton hotel, and would sit in the lobby and use the free wireless, which I find very funny because we get students that won’t walk two flights of stairs without taking an elevator between classes.  But they find that they can walk all the way…walk two blocks down to get online just to check to see what was going on on FaceBook…you know, what were they missing out on?  That was the most common thing that people said, was, “I felt like I was missing out on something.”

MT: Do you think that FaceBook is the primary internet resource that the students use, or at least the one that they miss the most?

CP: Socially, yes.  That’s their social outlet and we as an institution completely understand that.  It’s not that we were anti-FaceBook at all, it’s just that we wanted to bring light to our students, really we did not expect the media attention we got, but we really wanted our students to think about what these technologies meant to them and how it affected their means of communication.  So, we have a number of students that have friends from back home or from high school and that’s their main way of keeping in touch is through FaceBook and letting everyone know where the party is this weekend, or “hey check out this photo of Guido that I took the other day,” that sort of thing and sort of really embracing their own community that they’ve created.  Their digital community, the people outside of their circle of physical friends, if you will.  So it was really interesting how the conversations changed, then, once we had that bit of their day-to-day lives turned off, for a short period of time and how many student actually came back and said “hey, we were having conversations with other students in the hall. Go figure.  I don’t have to text someone to have a conversation.”

MT: Right.

Please come back tomorrow for part 2 of my interview with Charles Palmer of Harrisburg University.  Thanks for reading!

Researcher Interview #1 Part 4

Tuesday, November 2, 2010 @ 08:11 AM
Maura
(For the introduction to this interview, click here.  For Part 1, click here.  For Part 2, click here. For Part 3, click here.)

Click to Listen (4 1/2 minutes)

MT: This is Maura Thomas from RegainYourTime.com. Thanks for coming back to hear part four of my interview with Dr. John Dovidio, psychology professor at Yale University.  You can see the previous posts by clicking the link at the top of this page and prior pages.

…That’s actually a really great perspective.  I talk to a lot of people often who are becoming a little bit overwhelmed with the idea that, you know, “there is just too much and I can’t catch up.”  And I…I run into people every day who are deciding, in fact they even put it in these terms, “I’m trying to decide what my limit is.  And…you know, ok I did email, and now I’ve done Facebook, but I’m not going to do Twitter!  That’s just where I’m drawing the line, and anything else that comes out, I’m just all done.” (laughing)

JD: (laughing) Mmm hmmm.

MT: So…and there certainly is an age component to this.  But it’s…it’s really interesting to hear you say…talk about how humans have overcome this throughout history and…and…how we’re actually really good at it, and perhaps people should…take heart in that…in that idea.

JD: Oh yeah, I’m mean, we’ve…we’ve overcome worse!

MT: Sure. Sure.

JD: (laughing) We could overcome quite a bit!

MT: (laughing) Right.

JD: But I do…you know, at the same time, I think you’re also right by saying…and the people you quoted are right by saying, you’ve got to be cautious, realizing that whatever benefits might…benefits might be coming with the software and hardware development that we see in communication, we have to always understand that there is probably something that’s going to be lost because we just have a limited amount of time, we have a limited capacity for attention, …we have a limited capacity for being able to think and make decisions. Those are the bounds of being human, just like any other animal.  And so how do we actually teach people to use a lot of these media in a way that works to their benefit so that they don’t become overwhelmed or develop those habits so strongly that they’re hard to reverse.

You won’t remember this, and I really don’t remember it personally, but when television came in, you know, that changed everything, right?  People said, “well television is taking away from human relations. People are no longer talking to one another, they are no longer looking face-to-face, what they’re doing is they’re sitting side-by-side, and the quality of their relationships is going to go down, and tv is going to be the end of everything because people are going to become sedentary, they’re going to become passive, they’re going to need more stimulation.  And they’re going to lose sight between what’s real and what’s everyday life.”  And to some extent that was true, but then people adjust to it and now we look at tv and we see that as “how…how benign and passive.”

MT: That was part four of my interview with Dr. John Dovidio, psychology professor at Yale University. I hope you’ll come back tomorrow for the fifth and final portion of the interview where I’ll ask Dr. Dovidio about the value of reflection and quiet moments. Also, if you’re interested in reading up on the current research, please visit the Research and Resources page of this website. This is Maura Thomas from RegainYourTime.com. Thanks for visiting!

(Click here for the conclusion of the interview.)

Researcher Interview #1, Part 3

Monday, November 1, 2010 @ 08:11 AM
Maura
(For the introduction to this interview, click here.  For Part 1, click here.  For Part 2, click here.)

Click to Listen (4 minutes)

MT: This is Maura Thomas from RegainYourTime.com. Welcome to the third part of my interview with Dr. John Dovidio, psychology professor at Yale University.  You can see the previous posts by clicking the link at the top of this page and prior pages.

I think that’s a very valid point, and I also wonder if you think though, that it does, that it has detrimental effects? So people sitting in their office working all day with their email always open and it constantly downloading by itself, you know it goes out and pulls in the messages every five minutes, say, and so they…in some sense feel “compelled” to always check in with it and to always tear their attention away or allow their attention to be stolen by…by the new communication coming in, regardless of what form, whether it’s email or the ringing phone or the instant message or the text message or their FaceBook updates or their Twitter stream, or whatever it is. It almost seems like people are…even when I go to a coffee shop or a restaurant and I see people having meetings or having lunch and both of them have their phones in their hand and you’re lucky if any conversation is exchanged at all.  Tell me a little bit about if you think that these affects are detrimental, or if you think we’ll just…sort of…get used it to it and figure out how to manage it all.

JD: Actually the research on whether it’s detrimental or not is really mixed.  There’s a lot of work that shows that it’s diminishing the kind of face-to-face personal connections that we’ve had. It limits the amount of time people spend in face-to-face contact, having discussions, sitting around the dinner table, giving each other undivided attention, without a doubt.  On the other hand, it’s expanded the number of…it’s expanded the social networks of people in ways that we couldn’t imagine before.  And a lot of people want to say, that what this means is that we’re going to have a quantity/quality trade-off.  We’ll have 4,000 Facebook friends but not one real friend.  Right?  But this is the kind of challenge that human beings have always had in terms of managing the seductive, immediate things, with learning how to channel that and control that and manage that, for your benefit, not for your…for your detriment.  One of the problems for adolescents is that their inhibitory mechanisms are not fully developed, and so what they’ll tend to do is overly react to stimulation.  And it’s only when they get a little bit older and develop both in terms of neurological development but also just plain social development and practice being able to control that.  So there’s probably key times in development where kids are going to be overly stimulated in a way that could create habits of inattention later on in their life.  But they are fully capable, I hope, of actually being able to reverse some of those things as their situation changes.

MT: Hmmm, well that’s very hopeful.

That was part three of my interview with Dr. John Dovidio, psychology professor at Yale University.  I hope you’ll come back tomorrow to hear or read Dr. Dovidio’s comments on our ability to adapt to and keep up with the ever-changing technology environment.  Also, if you’re interested in reading up on the current research, please visit the “Research and Resources” page of this website. This is Maura Thomas from RegainYourTime.com.  Thanks for visiting!

(Click here for Part 4.)

Researcher Interview #1, Part 1

Thursday, October 28, 2010 @ 08:10 AM
Maura

For an introduction to this series, click here.

Click to Listen (3 minutes)

(Interview conducted by Maura Thomas, Chief Trainer at RegainYourTime.com)

MT: I’m speaking with Dr. John Dovidio from Yale University and he has been kind enough to allow me to interview him about attention and multitasking and the somewhat conflicting studies that are coming out lately around both of these. Dr. Dovidio teaches psychology at Yale.  Thanks for taking the time.

JD: Thank you.

MT: So I sent you a passage from an article by Matt Richtel from the New York Times…Matt Richtel is doing a series called “Your Brain on Computers” and this particular quote from his article says,

“Scientists say juggling email, phone calls, and other incoming information can change how people think and behave.  They say our ability to focus is being undermined by bursts of information.  These play to a primitive impulse to respond to immediate opportunities and threats.  The stimulation provokes excitement, a dopamine squirt, that researchers say can be addictive.  In its absence, people feel bored.”

Matt Richtel: “Attached to Technology and Paying a Price,” the New York Times

So I’ll first ask you, do you agree with his conclusions and do you have any thoughts?

JD: I think his conclusions…his argument is a good one, in that from an evolutionary perspective, we’re built to be attentive to things that tend to grab our attention, that we tend to lose focus. And we’ll keep…we’re very much attuned to things like motion, activity, color, flashes, because those all had evolutionary importance to us.  So it’s easy to become captivated by all the different things that you see on computers, on the web, and all the other devices that we have around us.  But it doesn’t mean that that is our destiny. I think he oversimplifies it a little bit, by saying, just because we have an evolutionary tendency to do something, doesn’t mean we can’t make adjustments, contemporary adjustments, to have that simulation work for us.

MT: This is Maura Thomas from RegainYourTime.com. Thanks for listening to part one of my interview with Dr. John Dovidio, psychology professor at Yale University.  I hope you’ll come back tomorrow to hear or read our discussion of the differences in the effects of media-multitasking in children’s brains vs. adult brains. Also, if you’re interested in reading up on the current research, please visit the “Research and Resources” page of this website. Thanks for visiting!

(Click here for Part 2 of the interview.)

I Won! Would You Read This Business Book?

Monday, August 9, 2010 @ 03:08 PM
Maura

Well, the votes are in and thanks to all the wonderful support from my friends, clients, and colleagues, my book proposal was selected as the winner in the Business Book Pitchfest, sponsored by Networlding and Crowdspring.  I am truly humbled by the support and grateful to every person who voted for me.  I’m excited to put my work together in a book, and about the opportunities for new partners, customers, and directions that a published book could bring.

I’ve got a lot of work ahead of me, and first is deciding to self-publish (with a small boutique publisher) or pitch to an agent or a large publishing house.  I look forward to learning about the publishing industry, and if you have any insight for me, I would be very grateful for you to share your wisdom with me.  Please contact me directly at maura at regainyourtime dot com.

A short description of the book-in-process is below, and I’d also love to hear from you if you have specific challenges or areas of interest related to this topic, that you would like to see addressed in the book.  Would you read this?

Book-in-Process:  Control Your Attention, Control Your Life:  Succeeding in the Attention Age

Summary:

Change is upon us.  Technology is evolving faster than ever before, and the sheer volume of information to manage is staggering. Digital Convergence is changing the way we communicate and learn. Although technology evolves very quickly, our brains evolve very slowly, and the rapid advance in technology over the last 40 years is shaping that evolution. It is literally rewiring our brains. The old ideas of multitasking and time management in the “Information Age” are being replaced by new ideas of focus and the Attention Age. The secret of productivity, of getting things done, of living the life we want now comes down to the ability to manage our attention. This goes way beyond time management, and it’s much more complicated than a calendar and an address book, or even the latest gadget or app. It requires greater knowledge of how our brains work, an understanding of the demands on our attention, and a rich, but uncomplicated, arsenal of behaviors, techniques, and technology.  This book will contain step-by-step instructions to learn to control attention by effectively managing the details of a busy life (commitments, communication, and information), discussing not only a behavioral methodology but also incorporating paper, PC, Mac, handheld, and cloud-based solutions.

I’d love to hear from you.  Thanks for reading, and for voting!

Incorporate Change in 3 Easy Steps (Part 1)

Thursday, May 21, 2009 @ 01:05 PM
Maura

We all know that changing our behaviors is hard.  Knowing we should exercise isn’t enough to get us into the gym or out on the Trail every day. It’s why most New Year’s Resolutions don’t last beyond January.  But there are three components to changing behaviors, and considering these might make it much easier for you to incorporate those new things into your life.

Whether it’s “going green,” improved productivity, or incorporating a new initiative, like volunteering, into your life, if you consider the following three steps, you can do these, or most anything else, much easier.

The first component is awareness.  Most of our habits are so ingrained in our lives and behavior that we don’t even recognize them anymore.  Becoming aware of the behaviors that aren’t serving you is the first step in changing them.  For example, if you want to incorporate more environmentally friendly habits into your lifestyle, it’s important to understand what you’re doing that doesn’t serve that desire.  Do you leave the water running when you brush your teeth?  Do you participate in your city’s recycling program?  Do you buy recycled products?  Try to think about areas where you could improve, perhaps even make a list.  Then the next time an opportunity presents itself, you’ll be more likely to remember that you want to change the behavior instead of just being on “autopilot” as you move through your day.

Do you pay attention to how you work every day?  Do you know how often you check your email in a day?  The answer might surprise you.  Do you have a process for managing your workload, or do you just respond to whatever calls your attention all day?  Give some thought to your existing behaviors.  Once you are aware of what you want to change, to the extent that you can articulate them to someone else, you’ll then become aware of opportunities to change them.  What you measure is what gets improved.  So what are YOU measuring?

Tomorrow I’ll post step 2, Education . Thanks for reading!

Switch to our mobile site